When You Are Right And Your Spouse Is Wrong (Part 2)

Yes, and so it is. When you are right and your spouse is wrong, any time, there remains the option for you to be right the "right way", not be right the "wrong way". (See previous post.) By being right the "right way", you respond to injustice or falsehood with dignity, not give up your dignity and bring you both down.

In a moment, a moment when you are right and your spouse is wrong, you are the "anchor" for the relationship, the marriage. You are the one, between the two of you, who God has in that moment handed personal responsibility and moral authority to, by your very position of being the one right, and your spouse being the one wrong. Thus you are required to lead the two of you in that morality given you that was handed you with calmness, understanding and patience.

You must allow your spouse to be wrong at times.

A different way of thinking says, "But if I keep letting him do this, he or she will never change!"

But have you ever stopped to ask yourself "Why does my loved one keep doing the same thing that's wrong over and over?

Well, it is psychologically relevant that you consider that when a person in your family keeps being wrong the same way over and over, and you can't seem to make the wrong behavior stop, it is possible that your family member "needs" to be wrong because "being wrong" is the first step to "being right" and "facilitating change!"

Yet you might reply, "But I have "told" him and I have "told" him over and over. Still he will not listen to me!!!" ... "I could talk until I'm ‘blue in the face', but it accomplishes nothing!!!"

Well, this is a critical question isn't it, "When you were right in what you said to him, did you say what was right in anger or impatience? Has there ever been rage, threats or insults from you on this precise wrong he or she keeps doing? If so, then perhaps your being right the wrong way, is what stands in the path of your husband or wife proceeding in the process of making that wrong behavior better.

You see, people do not like being "told" what to do. We humans are so tempted to do the "opposite" of what we're told, when what we're told (although right) is said in anger, rage, impatience and threats.

Even Christ did not force His will on people. But He was patient and kind.

"But my husband was impatient with me first!" you say ... "But my wife seems so cold and angry, what else am I to do but defend myself and insist I'm right??!!!"

That's the central point isn't it. "What to do when the other person is wrong first."

Well, in the Sermon On the Mount Christ said:

"... if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift." (Matthew 5:23-24)

What is amazing this is what Christ "didn't" say. He "didn't say" to leave your gift at the altar, then go reconcile "if what your brother has against you is relevant, "makes sense" or is "correct" in having something against you."

You see, "Love... suffers long and is kind, ... does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil, ... bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never fails." (I Corinthians: 4, 5, 7, 8 (a))

Yet, you might say, "But my husband (or wife) was impatient with me first!" ... "Does this mean he (she) does not love me????"

Absolutely not. When your husband or wife is wrong in something, that only means he or she is weak, "Not That He Or She Does Not Love You!!!. Be it a reaction, a word, an action, a decision ... your husband or wife is the one between the two of you who is at that time most "weak", that is all. ..... Let it happen. ..... It is necessary. And don't worry, there will be your turn to be the one weak, thus wrong. You will need the strength reciprocated in the marriage.

Your spouse needs to be wrong sometimes. (And I mean husband "and" wife.) When it happens (and it will), don't worry, it will be your turn to be wrong and weak another time. For now though, be right graciously.

Remember, in marriage, the two of you are ONE. Nothing has really happened BAD until "both" of you act badly. Too easily, however, negativity can escalate, then the two in marital bond can spiral downward.

It is only in responding correctly, thus patiently, that your being "right" brings balance, even veneration, to your mate's experience of wrong. For just as it takes "two" to argue, it especially takes "two" to "continue" the argument. Thus one can choose, while being right, to be right calmly.

You cannot be your spouse's conscience. As you try to be his (or her) conscience, you will actually accomplish the opposite. Remember, he or she must be wrong first, in simple or big things, before being right through hearing the small, still voice of God.


"Father, grant me the peace and strength to be the one who is strong and gracious if I must in my marriage today. Remind me in your mercy, that I will often need such kindness as well."

When You Are Right, And Your Spouse Is Wrong

"There is more hunger for love and appreciation in this world than for bread."

Mother Teresa of Calcutta (Albanian born Indian Missionary and Founder of the Order of the Missionaries of Charity. Nobel Prize for Peace in 1979. 1910-1997)

************

No, really, I'm not joking. "What about the times you are 'right", and your husband or wife is 'wrong'?" It "does" happen you know. Let's admit that. Sometimes you are right and the one you are married to is wrong. Maybe "too" often, and "too" wrong. Or so it seems. Honestly, it seems that way. Right??!!!

After reading WHAT CATHOLICS BELIEVE (PART ONE), you see that everything that's basic to Christian marriage is spelled out remarkably in the Catholic Catechism ("Part Two" is coming soon). However, there's another step in our process of assimulating truth which can be referred to as Catholic Psychology. That is: "When you are 'right' and the other person is 'wrong', if your response to that other person's 'wrong' is 'also wrong', then you are no longer 'right', but you have become 'more wrong' than the 'wrong' the other person was 'wrong' with, because you used the position of being 'right" to get there!"

"Remember, when our Lord was in the flesh on earth, He was continually merciful, understanding and forgiving to "everyone", but not with the "Scribes and Pharisees" who used their position and knowledge of being "right", to make themselves appear better than others while they did so in sarcasm impatience and anger. ... And wow, was Christ ever angry with them!!!!!

You see, when you as a husband or wife are "right", and your husband or wife is "wrong", how do you think you arrived to being "right" in the first place??? Do you think your "being right" comes from your own superior skill of reasoning?"

No. ... Do not be mistaken. ... If you are "right" and your husband or wife is "wrong", you are in the position of being "right" because "being right" was given to you by God. He chose "you" to be the one who would be "right" this time. And it is "He" who makes you and the one you love ONE, and continues to do so as He promised!

How otherwise will a marriage grow in understanding and loving service to our Lord? The only way a marriage can survive and flourish in this world of confusion, is that when one of the two in the marriage is "wrong", the other is not only "right", but "stays right".

You see, it is "inevitable" that in the experiences of home life, wrong words will be said, wrong actions will be taken. It is absloutely certain that in instances, wrong feelings will be felt, and wrong thoughts will be thought. But you and the person you married are "ONE", not "Two". So how does "one" that once was "two" grow and become more than they ever would have been alone???!!!

Well, not to be silly here, but it is as if the two of you will practically "take turns being wrong!" And you will each be wrong in ways each will not recognize in the moment, accept by the help of the other (and by God).

Admit it, you are "both" wrong through various times of day and night, and then, when you insist you are "right", that is when you are the "most wrong", because your being "right" is done in "anger" and "self-righteousness" (The very things Christ hates).

See clearly, isn't it sometimes the case that a husband is strong and the wife is weak? Aren't there occasions when the wife is strong and the husband is weak? Then surely you do not believe you are strong "all" the time, and the one you are ONE with is weak "continuously!!!" ... No, first one will be "weak", and thus wrong", then the other will be "strong, and thus right". This deep marital experience, our vocation to God, will manifest into a host of varitable patterns, and that, because the two human-beings of opposite genders are no longer "two" but "ONE!"

As the apostle Paul wrote:

"For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places." (Ephesians: 6:12)

There are pressures, tensions, responsibilities, temptations and misunderstandings that are common to marriage, but are not entirely common in singleness. When you are married with the potential of bringing offspring of souls into the world to be children of God for all of eternity, there are entities and powers greater than mere psychology or what you "think", that wish to destroy you and your sacred marital bond.

More about this later, but for now I ask you, "How can your husband or wife recover from the traumatic, complicated, physically exhausting experience of being wrong (on any level), if you insist on making that situation an opportunity to prove that you are 'more right'?"

Say what you have to say, then say no more. Don't make things worse than it already is. God is ONE with the two of you. Because of that marital trinity (God, husband, wife), then this person you share marital vows with will change something that is necessary to change, because after making your statement, you then step back so God can speak and the other can hear God speak without distraction.

What Catholics Believe About Marriage (Part One)

There are Catholics who have stopped living their faith. Some have become comfortable with what the world offers them. Catholocism is a "culture" to them. Something they grew up under, but ignoring what was said to them. This has convinced others that Christian Catholics are hypocritics, believing in only "works" for salvation. The Church is rediculed, called too traditional, religious and without faith. ..... How they are so mistaken.

For we many Catholics who "are" serious about what we believe, let us read with our husbands and wives the purposes and means of our marital vocations as stated in the remarkable Catechism of our Faith:
(Note: This is prelude for where we're headed in our exhaustive discussion of Catholic Psychology in relation to the many circumstances that threaten peace and stability in our marriages and homes.)

1601 "The matrimonial covenant, by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life, is by its nature ordered toward the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring; this covenant between baptized persons has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament."84

1603 "The intimate community of life and love which constitutes the married state has been established by the Creator and endowed by him with its own proper laws. . . . God himself is the author of marriage."87 The vocation to marriage is written in the very nature of man and woman as they came from the hand of the Creator. Marriage is not a purely human institution despite the many variations it may have undergone through the centuries in different cultures, social structures, and spiritual attitudes. ...

1604 "... Since God created him man and woman, their mutual love becomes an image of the absolute and unfailing love with which God loves man. It is good, very good, in the Creator's eyes. ..."

1605 Holy Scripture affirms that man and woman were created for one another: "It is not good that the man should be alone."92 The woman, "flesh of his flesh," his equal, his nearest in all things, is given to him by God as a "helpmate"; she thus represents God from whom comes our help.93 "Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh."94 The Lord himself shows that this signifies an unbreakable union of their two lives by recalling what the plan of the Creator had been "in the beginning": "So they are no longer two, but one flesh."95

1606 Every man experiences evil around him and within himself. This experience makes itself felt in the relationships between man and woman. Their union has always been threatened by discord, a spirit of domination, infidelity, jealousy, and conflicts that can escalate into hatred and separation. This disorder can manifest itself more or less acutely, and can be more or less overcome according to the circumstances of cultures, eras, and individuals, but it does seem to have a universal character.

1607 According to faith the disorder we notice so painfully does not stem from the nature of man and woman, nor from the nature of their relations, but from sin. As a break with God, the first sin had for its first consequence the rupture of the original communion between man and woman. Their relations were distorted by mutual recriminations;96 their mutual attraction, the Creator's own gift, changed into a relationship of domination and lust;97 and the beautiful vocation of man and woman to be fruitful, multiply, and subdue the earth was burdened by the pain of childbirth and the toil of work.98

1608 Nevertheless, the order of creation persists, though seriously disturbed. To heal the wounds of sin, man and woman need the help of the grace that God in his infinite mercy never refuses them.99 Without his help man and woman cannot achieve the union of their lives for which God created them "in the beginning."

1609 In his mercy God has not forsaken sinful man. The punishments consequent upon sin, "pain in childbearing" and toil "in the sweat of your brow,"100 also embody remedies that limit the damaging effects of sin. After the fall, marriage helps to overcome self-absorption, egoism, pursuit of one's own pleasure, and to open oneself to the other, to mutual aid and to self-giving.

1610 ... the law given to Moses aims at protecting the wife from arbitrary domination by the husband, even though according to the Lord's words it still carries traces of man's "hardness of heart" which was the reason Moses permitted men to divorce their wives.101

1611 Seeing God's covenant with Israel in the image of exclusive and faithful married love, the prophets prepared the Chosen People's conscience for a deepened understanding of the unity and indissolubility of marriage.102 The books of Ruth and Tobit bear moving witness to an elevated sense of marriage and to the fidelity and tenderness of spouses. Tradition has always seen in the Song of Solomon a unique expression of human love, insofar as it is a reflection of God's love - a love "strong as death" that "many waters cannot quench."103

1614 ... The matrimonial union of man and woman is indissoluble: God himself has determined it "what therefore God has joined together, let no man put asunder."107

1615 This unequivocal insistence on the indissolubility of the marriage bond may have left some perplexed and could seem to be a demand impossible to realize. However, Jesus has not placed on spouses a burden impossible to bear, or too heavy - heavier than the Law of Moses.108 By coming to restore the original order of creation disturbed by sin, he himself gives the strength and grace to live marriage in the new dimension of the Reign of God. It is by following Christ, renouncing themselves, and taking up their crosses that spouses will be able to "receive" the original meaning of marriage and live it with the help of Christ.109 This grace of Christian marriage is a fruit of Christ's cross, the source of all Christian life.

1616 This is what the Apostle Paul makes clear when he says: "Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her," adding at once: "'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one. This is a great mystery, and I mean in reference to Christ and the Church."110

1617 The entire Christian life bears the mark of the spousal love of Christ and the Church. Already Baptism, the entry into the People of God, is a nuptial mystery; it is so to speak the nuptial bath.111 which precedes the wedding feast, the Eucharist. Christian marriage in its turn becomes an efficacious sign, the sacrament of the covenant of Christ and the Church. Since it signifies and communicates grace, marriage between baptized persons is a true sacrament of the New Covenant..112

1620 Both the sacrament of Matrimony and virginity for the Kingdom of God come from the Lord himself. It is he who gives them meaning and grants them the grace which is indispensable for living them out in conformity with his will.117 Esteem of virginity for the sake of the kingdom118 and the Christian understanding of marriage are inseparable, and they reinforce each other:

1621 In the Latin Rite the celebration of marriage between two Catholic faithful normally takes place during Holy Mass, because of the connection of all the sacraments with the Paschal mystery of Christ.120 In the Eucharist the memorial of the New Covenant is realized, the New Covenant in which Christ has united himself for ever to the Church, his beloved bride for whom he gave himself up.121 It is therefore fitting that the spouses should seal their consent to give themselves to each other through the offering of their own lives by uniting it to the offering of Christ for his Church made present in the Eucharistic sacrifice, and by receiving the Eucharist so that, communicating in the same Body and the same Blood of Christ, they may form but "one body" in Christ.122

1624 The various liturgies abound in prayers of blessing and epiclesis asking God's grace and blessing on the new couple, especially the bride. In the epiclesis of this sacrament the spouses receive the Holy Spirit as the communion of love of Christ and the Church.124 The Holy Spirit is the seal of their covenant, the ever available source of their love and the strength to renew their fidelity.

1638 "From a valid marriage arises a bond between the spouses which by its very nature is perpetual and exclusive; furthermore, in a Christian marriage the spouses are strengthened and, as it were, consecrated for the duties and the dignity of their state by a special sacrament."140

1639 The consent by which the spouses mutually give and receive one another is sealed by God himself.141 From their covenant arises "an institution, confirmed by the divine law, . . . even in the eyes of society."142 The covenant between the spouses is integrated into God's covenant with man: "Authentic married love is caught up into divine love."143

1640 Thus the marriage bond has been established by God himself in such a way that a marriage concluded and consummated between baptized persons can never be dissolved. This bond, which results from the free human act of the spouses and their consummation of the marriage, is a reality, henceforth irrevocable, and gives rise to a covenant guaranteed by God's fidelity. The Church does not have the power to contravene this disposition of divine wisdom.144

Vital Oneness In Marriage

.

A fellow Catholic blogger, Shannon, wrote:

Jim,

Thank you, and I did read your response this morning. Actually, I read it a few times as I enjoyed what you said tremendously. You have a gift of communicating ideas in a simple, understandable way. I loved how you touched on men being tempted by women when all their needs are met within their marriage. I'd love to read more about that and about the impact of pornography on the psyche and on marriages. Your blog is fabulous; I have it in my 'Live Bookmarks' so I know instantly of any updates :) Keep up the Good work and God bless :)

My response:

Thank-you Shannon.

Yes, I would like to address in our posts the impact of pornography on the psyche of both males and females, as well as the affects of this increasing phenomenon on marriage from a truly Catholic Psychological perspective. To do this, we will continue to build a basis and framework for our discussion. (Please know that your responses of encouragement, questions, even challenges, are so appreciated.)

In our current high-pace, high-tech society, its easy to lose touch with what's important in life. One thing that's vital in our lives, is the priority of our marital relationships as we mentioned earlier. Through the Sacrament of marriage, God made you and your spouse "ONE". This means when the two of you as a married couple are separate in any of a host of ways, you and your spouse are each "less" of a person than you are when you are together, and in that togetherness, sharing in the experience as "one".

Much of the world fails to realize this. Much of the world doubts there is a loving, Christian God. Much of the world doubts the proper place of parents in the raising of children, doubts the proper place of families in general. Much of the world doubts the power of the Church to administer in things that are spiritual. Thus, inevitably, the world as we know it, will doubt, even resist, the concept of the spirit filled Sacrament, the holy psychology as it were, of a God directed Catholic man, and God directed Catholic woman, consummating their sacred marriage in a holy moment in sacred privacy, to no longer be "two", but be recognized in heaven to forever, while on earth, be "one".

Psychologically, it makes no sense. No current research or theoretical model explains it. I mean how precisely as the "Trinity" is ONE in the Godhead, the "Father, Son and Holy Spirit", so is a man and woman "One" in a trinity as "God, husband and wife"!

Its the reason we marry in a Church, and not on a "beach", or "parachuting out of planes".

You see, its not about "us". It's about "God". "He" did it. It's done. Finished. There's nothing to add nor take away. All there is now, is merely time to pass for the husband and wife to spend a lifetime "actualizing", "briinging into visuability" and "applying" what is already established, declared and completed in heaven.

Why is this important? ... "Because, when following the administrations Christ directs through His Church on earth, everything is made more simple!" ...

You see, What you THINK about yourself as a wife is "not" what's important. What you THINK of your husband as a man has little relevance. What you THINK of your wife as a woman carries little weight on earth and heaven. What you THINK about yourself as a husband in your marriage, accomplishes virtually nothing

It's what you "do"! It's what you "do" with what's been "given" you. But first you must be clear about what that is.

You know what I mean. Although marriage has "SO MUCH" wonderfulness, there are occasions when each wife wishes she had been a nun! And there are moments when a husband looks to the skies and laments that he had not chosen a life of priesthood, or chosen to have been a monk on some secluded mountain in the Himalayas!

But don't let that surprise you. Don't be shocked. It happens to "all" of us. We're each currently still in our flesh, and we're "human".

What matters first is not what you think or even what you feel, No, what you "think" and "feel" can change rapidly from one instant to another. What matters, and I mean "truly" matters first are two things. First, that in each moment "God is on His throne", and second, that you and your spouse are ONE in your God who is continually on His throne.

As Catholics, this is the first immovable, sure object we have to count on through the storms that do come through life.

I mean, like when your wife or husband turns over in bed at night in a state of anger, refusing to speak to you. You ask, "What's the matter, honey ... Did I do something wrong???" There is no answer, then you are lost for the rest of the night in thought, and maybe tears!

What do you do, then, as a man or woman? How does a Christian husband or wife respond, without first "falling-apart" and feeling ill-equipped to do anything at all!

It begins by recognizing with every molecule of your being, that we, as devout loyal practicing Christian Catholics, have something that most in the world do not have. You, wife, ... you, husband, ... are "full" and "complete", not based on what you "feel", "think", or "judge in yourself at a given moment", but instead of what the Holy Sacrament of marriage administered by the Church established you as being at every moment of the day or night, at times that are good and times that are bad. From that position, and from that position of alone, are we ready to proceed to discuss what a wife or husband can do about lies launched upon you by Satan. Things that surround you and your spouse, slyfully wishing to penetrate and destroy your marriage. Things like doubt, fear, gossip, injustice, cruelty, judgmentalism, coalitions of hatred, and pornography.

For now, in this post until the next one, remember that you and your husband or wife are "ONE". Everything the two of you ever could possibly need, are found in each other by the grace, mercy and power of God. For now, at some moment when your loved one least expects it, run and "tackle" him or her. Throw yourselves on the couch, the bed, whatever. As your wife or husband is shocked, no matter what surrounds the two of you in the confusing circumstances of life, say with a huge smile on your face, "Honey, I love you "sssssssoooooooo"much and share in a big, big, big, big wonderful kiss! ... With that, you will be fulfilling your holy vocation in life, and God "will" bless you!

(Remember, we have more we will be discussing soon, ...)

But from the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.

Husband-Wife Need For Each Other

In response to the posted article "Husband and Wife, Love and Priority", a fellow blogger "Dauphine" made comments of which the following is a portion. Please read. I have a response afterwards:

"Do you know how long I've been pondering in my mind what you just so eloquently stated in this post? Yes yes and yes!! The relationship of husband and wife has been put on the back burner and seemingly having children if that's what the couple 'wants' is a way to justify this now 'old fashioned' arrangement. Husbands and wives do indeed need each other first, as this is healthy for them as well as a healthy and ordered example for their children."


Dauphine:

Thank-you for your response. Looking at things psychologically, I think we greatly miss in our current culture how "tremendously" husbands and wives need each other. Not only is committed marriage considered "old fashioned", but aspects of our culture and lives have caused us to "compartmentalize" our duties, time and enjoyments together in marriage commitment.

Our needs are met "inside" marriage, not "outside". For example, we husbands, who tend to be impacted greatly by what we see visually, are bombarded by media with women dressed seductively to intice men for the sake of advertising. Yet, everything a man could ever want, could ever need, is met abundantly in his wife.

God made woman and man this way. Only we are easily distracted to think "Maybe the grass is greener on the other side". But it never is.

Note: Research indicates that emotional closeness is prone to decrease with a couple during the period when they are raising children. It need not.

Often, great marital experience begins with the husband and wife purposing to spend enough "TIME" together. And when we do spend "TIME" with our wife or husband, maybe we should not be so quick to get caught up in the "psychology" of what is troubling us.

First, spend "TIME" together. Commit to two hours a week of being together as a couple with none of your beautiful children around! ... For two hours a week, spend time together, for each other, with no one else around. Don't talk about "problems". Just "BE TOGETHER". Commit to that specific time-slot together alone for the two of you every week. Hold to it religiously. Don't worry about "How things will work out." God put more than we realize in man and in woman, so that a natural process transpires alone in itself and in its own time.

The choosing of a specific two hour slot of time together on a weekly basis speaks "volumes" to both the man and the woman. Experienctially, it establishes on deep emotional as well as practical levels that "You are a couple." The mere fact of "TIME ALONE TOGETHER" reinforces in the mind, soul and body that "Each is the most important person to the other." (If you don't feel you are the most important person to each other, don't worry about it. You "are". Spend time together and the Holy Spirit with His abundant grace and power will make this relevant! You don't have to know the reason behind everything!)

Let me go a little further with this. ... So often we couples argue frustratingly with our wife or husband, when strange as it might seem, the reason for our frustration is that we need the other person we're arguing with so greatly! ... (Its an amazing phenomenon.)

Finally, with so much talk in our society today, I believe there is not enough emphasis on "sex". Yes, and I mean the only healthy and truly loving sex there is, that which is and can be within marriage.

Sex is a wonderful thing, given to married couples, and no one else, and so much more important than all our societal "noise" recognizes. The precious, sacred sexual relationship between a husband and wife, guarded and cherished within the healthy confines of lifelong matrimony, is the "THERAPY" natural in itself to move the couple relationship forward to spiritual and emotional healthiness, peace and maturity. ... If every thought of man at a moment of weakness was to grow to instantly turning to thoughts of his wife alone, and if every response to negative impulse of a wife was to "influence" her husbands in directions good for both of them, then there is no end to the joy and healing that can take place.

Yes, Dauphine, husbands and wives are not comoplete without each other. We were never meant to be complete without each other! ... Too often we withdraw from the one we love, then unconsciously criticize them for the weakness they exhibit due to our withrawal. ... If we would only realize that often the times when we fight, are really the times we are saying "We need time together!" Time to rub a back gently. Time to walk on the beech and notice the sunset, while not saying anything. ... And if that difficult to do, start with twenty minutes. ... Trust the process. And when you trust the process, make it faith in God as well.

Where Psychology Is Not Received

CatholicPsychology.Blogspot received a kind e-mail from a fellow Catholic-blogger from Singapore. His name is "David". The following are portions of his communication. Please read. Afterwards, I will comment from a psychological perspective:

Hi Jim,
Thank you so much for your kind and encouraging words! Will continue to do my best and do pray that I would always allow the Holy Spirit to guide me as I blog for His people and Glory. ...

Psychotherapy has always been one of my interests but I don't have the time nor chance to learn more about it... I've read a couple of books on counselling and have applied whatever I know to help friends/family resolve conflicts and emotional problems - would love to learn from you and your informative blog!

Psychotherapy is still a taboo in Singapore... so most people would prefer not to seek help until it's often too late... Hence, wherever I can, I would try to help those who need help but wouldn't go to a psychiatrist/psychologist - of course, I would always attempt to lead them to professional help wherever possible; this seldom works and I just have to rely on the Lord to use me as an instrument...

I enjoyed your blog very much as it contains a wealth of information for Catholics - I like the depth and breadth of topics and your style of writing. ..."

************
David, my friend, thank-you for your correspondence. Yes, it is understood in American psychological education, that culturally, European/American born psychological approach is not readily welcomed in Asian communities. However, this is all the more reason the Catholic Church, with its Sacraments, Catechism, Canon Law, Papacy, Eucharist, Apostolic Cessation, fellowship of the saints, Mary as our blessed mother, and nearly 2,000 years of continuing as a singular Body of Christ, is vital in ministry of bringing peace, light and hope to a world that includes vast quantities of varied culture.

The purpose of CatholicPsycholgy.Blogspot is to turn attention to the fact that this "Family" called the Catholic Church, is an already established spiritual presence on
earth, that can meet both "spiritual" and "psychological" brokenness, pain and doubt in human lives! The Catholic Church is the one entity that has continued to stand, that has continued to exist, in its basic, unalterable form through all of history since the time of the Apostle who walked with Christ Himself.

My point is, "We are 'Family'." WE ARE ONE FAMILY. We are Family to those who have no family. The ever virgin blessed Mary is our mother. The saints and fellow believers in Christ who have gone on to the next life, by God's Holy Spirit, continue to be in our lives in very real ways. Personally and deeply intervening through prayer before God to address real emotional pain and loss in our lives and relationships.

Our Family prays for us. Blessed Mary, by means of the Holy Spirit and before Christ her Son, is continually in intercession for us.

Yes, Mary, ever virgin, the mother of Christ, is even here to hold our hand at night or any time we feel alone. Through the merciful power of God, each of us, those who've been emotionally traumitized, broken. Many without mothers of our own. WE ARE NOT ALONE. We have a mother. We have family.

Perhaps together we can show how psychologically, whatever is dysfunctional in our families on earth, is made pure and loving, by the FAMILY we have surrounding us as a cloud of witnesses.

Dave, you and any others, please consider sending your thoughts, your insight, your questions to CatholicPsychology.Blogspot. Together we will demonstrate precisely how specific tradition, teachings and Catholic Cataconisis meets the needs of an emotionally hurting world.

************
Dave, from Singapore, has valuable thoughts and contributions for Catholics at the following locations:
- Just a Thought: http://www.davidwoon.com/blog
- Memoirs of a Sojourner: http://sojournermemoirs.blogspot.com
- Family Matters: http://www.blogcharm.com/familymatters
- Freeware Haven: http://www.blogcharm.com/freewarehaven
- Website: http://www.davidwoon.com/

Sex That Is Meaningful

"One cannot speak of human sex without speaking of love. When speaking of love, however, we should remember that it is a specifically human phenomenon. And we must see to it that it is preserved in its humanness, rather than treated in a reductionistic way. ... Human sex is always more than mere sex, and it is more than sex to the extent that it serves as the physical expression of something metasexual, ... the physical expression of love. Only to the extent that sex carries out this function is it a really rewarding experience." (Viktor E. Frankl, The Unheard Cry for Meaning: Psychotherapy and Humanism, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1978, pp. 79-80)

Frankl explains that all human sex is not necessarily human, especially if one treats it merely as a means of relieving sexual tensions, either by masturbating or through using a partner as a means to the same end. Such sex is neurotic, the act of someone who uses himself or others compulsively to achieve purely self-centered, narcissistic ends: "...only a neurotic individual is out first and foremost to get rid of his sperma, be it by masturbation or by using the partner as just another means to the same end." (Ibid., p. 81)

For Frankl, love means the grasping or comprehending of the unique existence or being of another. In the sexual context, grasping the uniqueness of a loved one by definition would lead to a monogamous commitment, because no other could replace the loved one whose special identity is being deeply felt. In contrast, promiscuity means ignoring the other's uniqueness, because several partners are seen as interchangeable. Promiscuity means being content with the partner as an object, not a person:

"Since only that sex which is embedded in love can be really rewarding and satisfactory, the quality of the sexual life of such an individual is poor. Small wonder, then, that he tries to compensate for this lack of quality with quantity. This, in turn, requires an ever increased and intensified stimulation, as is provided, for one, by pornography." (Ibid.)

Frankl points out the hypocrisy in considering sexual promiscuity and pornography as "progressive" since they are in reality symptoms of retardation in one's sexual maturation, signs of a dehumanizing alienation, frustrating the human search for meaning:

"In the existential vacuum resulting from this ..., the sexual libido hypertrophies, and it is this hypertrophy that brings about the inflation of sex. Like any other kind of inflation ..." (as in the money market) "sexual inflation is associated with a devaluation; sex is devaluated inasmuch as it is dehumanized. Thus, we observe a trend to living a sexual life that is not integrated into one's personal life, but rather is lived out for the sake of pleasure. Such depersonalization of sex is a symptom of existential frustration: the frustration of man's search for meaning."
(Ibid., p. 82)

In summary, note the following conclusions for we who are practicing Catholics:

(1) Human sexuality includes the intimate loving relationship of discovering the God-given sacred uniqueness of another human being. To do anything less, stops it from being so.

(2) Sexual preoccupation with more than one person, establishes that people are interchangeable. In experience, it translates the person that is loved into an object, not a person, to relieve sexual tension on impulse.

(3) Because this kind of sexual relationship is less human, it is also less satisfying. Having less "quality", it pursues greater "quantity". In the end, it increases frustration, and on all levels makes the relationship far less than what it could have been.

(4) Sex for the mere purpose of relieving sexual tension, by oneself or with the use of another, is neurotic and self-centered (narcissistic).

(5) Human sexuality is the deeply personal and enjoyable experience of sacrifice and need of one individual of the opposite gender for a lifetime. Together, if possible, the two bring other souls into the world to worship God for eternity.

I think perhaps all of us have failed in this area, on one level or another, consciously or subconsciously. Let us understand, the consequences are sadly so greatly harming to the very one, as well as other people we love.

"You have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart." (Matthew 5:27-28)

************

(Viktor Emil Frankl, M.D., Ph.D., (March 26, 1905 - September 2, 1997) was an Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist. Frankl was the founder of logotherapy and Existential Analysis, the "Third Viennese School" of psychotherapy. His book Man's Search for Meaning (first published in 1946) chronicles his experiences as a concentration camp inmate and describes his psychotherapeutic method of finding meaning in all forms of existence, even the most sordid ones, and thus a reason to continue living. He was one of the key figures in existential therapy.)

What Does It Mean To be "IN LOVE"

Am I in love? Most young people, especially when in their teens, ask themselves that sometime. They know it feels good. They want to have a happy life, and they think, and are not so wrong, that a good choice of a marriage partner makes a vital difference. It does.

But even though there is perhaps more talk of love today than in the past, not everyone knows what love is. Many think it is a feeling. Thank heavens it is not merely that. You could not build a lifelong marriage on feelings -they flicker too much. ...

We start with a remarkable idea from modern Psychology, namely, "Somatic Resonance". It says this: since we are made of two parts, body and soul, matter and spirit, and since, further, these two are so closely put together that they make just one person, then, as a result, if I have a condition on one of the two sides, for smooth running I need a parallel condition on the other side.

To illustrate. A great innovator in modern psychology was Thomas Vernor Moore. He practiced psychiatry in D. C.. One day, he reported in a book, that a man who had manic depressive psychosis came to him for help. At the time, he was down in the deep black part of the cycle, in depression. He said he was losing his faith. Moore in writing it up said no, the man was not losing his faith. He said the real trouble was this: the process - Moore meant biochemistry - of his disease was interfering with the somatic resonance to his faith.

Here it is: faith was of course on the side of the spirit, but the bad chemistry was on the side of the body. Because of this remarkable tie between the two parts, that bad chemistry affected what he thought was his faith. It could not expel faith, (when the patient came up out of that black swing he still had his faith.) But it was keeping faith from functioning. No wonder the poor man thought he was losing his faith.

We can use this idea of "somatic resonance". We ask: where in a human is love? We reply, it is basically on the side of the soul, but it normally has a resonance in the body. We are glad to learn this, for something in the spiritual soul can last even a lifetime; something on the body side alone would be unstable, would flicker.

... We see that love is basically in our wills, it is the will, wish, or desire for the happiness and well-being of another for the other's sake. ... There is a broad spectrum of things that can be the resonance: at one end of the scale is the nonsexual love of parents for their own children - at the other end is explicitly sexual response - and points in between.

But now we see there is room to make a mistake. Someone could mistake that biochemistry, that bodily part of the picture, for the central thing, for love in the soul. And if he/she would not only make that mistake, but marry on the strength of a mistake, ... (that) is enough to make any sensible person really careful. A failed marriage is one of the greatest tragedies of a lifetime. So we need to watch out.

Then: how can anyone tell if he/she has real love, or only just chemistry that mimics love? ... To understand it, we need to look at the tremendous psychological design made by our Father in Heaven.

We all start out life as babies - no other way to do it. But a baby is perfectly selfish. If he could talk he would say: These big giants around me - they are here to give me what I want, when I want it, as I want it. Or I will fix them: Waa!

Is such a baby ready for real love, for willing good to another for the other's sake? Far from it: it is completely in a shell of self. But then: How can he get away from that shell to the point where he can really be interested in the well-being of another for the other's sake? That takes some doing. Our Father's plan has arranged a marvelous "machinery" as it were. If we use it the way He built it, it will work wonders - if not, the results may look good, but will be foul on the inside, and in time, one must pay.

We follow the development. Baby soon plays with other little ones, and soon makes a horrifying discovery: "Why that little guy thinks he has some rights - he does not. I am the only one who has rights." They are fighting over a toy. There are many such incidents, and a beginning is made of chipping away at the shell of self.

Around age 9 for boys - and similar for girls - comes a time many psychologists call the flight of the sexes. Little boys have no use for little girls - and vice versa. But this too is part of our Father's plan: He wants them to run away from each other to develop their own special characteristics, to prepare for the next stage.

This next stage comes automatically, when biochemistry changes, when certain hormones start to operate. Then, to his surprise, one day little boy sees a girl, and says to himself, "She is wonderful, marvelous! ... In this new phase two powerful processes begin to work. If we use them the way our Father has planned, they develop real love - if not, only a sad counterfeit that look the same to a confused eye.

First, love as we said means "willing good to the other for the other's sake." Psychologically the process starts when a boy or girl sees something fine in the other: ...

We said something can go wrong - or rather, the person can make it go wrong. In two ways: First if he/she uses sex for private entertainment, masturbation, that does not get one out of the shell of self where he/she started. No, it turns one back right into that shell - a poor forecast for a happy marriage which needs real unselfishness and love.

The second way that is selfish takes two, namely, two people use each other for sensory pleasure. That word's use, "sensory pleasure", is really right: if they do that, they are not only not watching for the happiness and welfare of the other - they are putting each other into a state such that if death happened along, they would be miserable forever. This is more like hatred than love, for there is no "willing good" to the other for the other's sake. They, we said, are "using" each other.

It is easy to see that real love can hardly develop when people are using each other, instead of really wanting the happiness of the other. Yes, they are giving sensory stimulation, very strong at that. But that is not the same as love.

But, tragically, this will feel the same as if there were real love, the biochemistry is identical. But in such a premarital pattern real love could hardly develop. It is closer to hatred. since it endangers the real, permanent happiness of the other.

Next we see: it is so easy for a person to make the mistake of a lifetime, in mistaking chemistry for love. In time, when emotions simmer down after marriage, he/she will find out it had been only chemistry. ...

But to look at the pleasant side of the picture: if the people play the game as our Father designed it, it will really develop powerful love, and make for a happy life in the future. Male and female psychology are terribly different. ... During courtship, these differences cannot be seen - they are all papered over by intense emotion. But as we said, after marriage, things do simmer down - and then they find out. They may find themselves locked into the same house with someone they do not really love at all. This is a real tragedy, one of life's greatest tragedies.

Even in a fine match, each one will be able to say honestly: I have to give in most of the time to make this work. But if they play the game as our Father designed it, they will find that they can make the sacrifices that are needed and can be quite content and happy in doing so. ... In fact, if they positively intend to do things and accept sacrifices as part of our Father's plan, then marriage is, as Pope John Paul VI said, "a long path toward sanctification." Then, for example, if the baby cries at 3 AM, if the Mother or Father intends to take care of the baby as a part of our Father's plan, then that time can rightly be called a holy hour.

But: how can one protect against making the dreadful mistake some make, who react in the opposite way? First of all, as we said, play the game the way our Father has designed it. That really will generate love. But also, have enough good sense to ask for help. ...

As we said, male and female psychology are tremendously different. Even in a fine match, there will be disagreements, probably some of them strong, in a marriage. But what if one marries someone of a very different culture , or even a different religion? Then the potential for trouble is greatly multiplied. Again, one with good sense will use really great care.

... God wants us to follow Him for two reasons: 1) He loves everything that is good, and that goodness calls us to follow Him; 2)He wants intensely to give us good things and happiness. For that, we need to be open to receive: His commands really are instructions about how to be open. At the same time, they steer us away from "traps" that lie in the very nature of things, such as hangovers after a drinking, or a loveless marriage after a lot of premarital sex.

Long ago when we first had electric refrigerators, the instructions told us that if we wanted the freezer in the refrigerator to be cold, we would need to occasionally "defrost" the freezer, which involved taking the ice out. Someone might say: That manufacturer is silly: "ice makes things cold", how can that be "good" for a refrigerator! Similarly, to one in a daze from emotion, our Father's plans may seem foolish. But He is our manufacturer. He knows how we are built. If we did not defrost the old fridge, it would not work well - neither will a human life work well if we do not follow His principles, which tell us at times to do what our feelings seem to say is a mistake.

God wants our eternal happiness so much He sent His only Son to a hideous death to open up the possibilities of eternal happiness for us. Cannot we trust Him? He wants us to be happy here, and hereafter too.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The source of this material is "The Catholic Resource Network",
Trinity Communications, PO Box 3610, Manassas, VA 22110
Voice: 703-791-2576 Fax: 703-791-4250
Data: 703-791-4336

Woman in Vegetative State Shows Amazing Brain Activity (... Terri Shiavo?)

On September 8, 2006 newspapers and wire services reported: 'Vegetative' Woman's Brain Shows Surprising Activity - Tests Indicate Awareness, Imagination."

On that same day, the front page, the Washington Post included an article by Rob Stein stating:
“According to all the tests, the young woman was deep in a ‘vegetative state’ -- completely unresponsive and unaware of her surroundings. But then a team of scientists decided to do an unprecedented experiment, employing sophisticated technology to try to peer behind the veil of her brain injury for any signs of conscious awareness. ..."

“Without any hint that she might have a sense of what was happening, the researchers put the woman in a scanner that detects brain activity and told her that in a few minutes they would say the word "tennis," signaling her to imagine she was serving, volleying and chasing down balls. When they did, the neurologists were shocked to see her brain "light up" exactly as an uninjured person's would. It happened again and again. And the doctors got the same result when they repeatedly cued her to picture herself wandering, room to room, through her own home. ..."

The family of Terri Schindler Schiavo argued in court, pled to the public and the media, and petitioned lawmakers to allow similar tests to be preformed before making the irreversible decision to starve Terri to death. ... (As well as using law enforcement personel to prevent a Roman Catholic Priest from providing her Eucharistic bread in a last communion, claiming this as food that could not be provided to her based on law.) ... The pleas of the Schindler family were rebuffed by Judge George Greer, who became the final medical authority in Terri Schiavo’s diagnosis. The decision was court-ordered starvation.

Terri’s father, Robert Schindler, comments, “This new case is not surprising to our family. We are seeing a growing amount of evidence indicating that the diagnosis of ‘Persistent Vegetative State’ (PVS) is often misdiagnosed, resulting in dangerous and potentially fatal consequences for people with brain injuries, as documented in this new account of a brain injured woman. The danger of this diagnosis is that it is being used as a reason to kill innocent people with disabilities, like Terri. We believe that this PVS diagnosis is inhumane and it should be abolished.”

Contact: Robert Schindler, Terri Schiavo’s father, 727-490-7603

See the entire Washington Post article at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
wpdyn/content/article/2006/09/07/AR2006090700978.html

Other articles on this startling event:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1867596,00.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/08/science/08brain.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,1867473,00.html


Other websites on Terri Schiavo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terri_Schiavo
http://www.terrisfight.org/

The Psychology of Love

Through the ages, the mystic tradition of the Catholic Church has offered to us all we need for personal growth, heightened wisdom, and enhanced interpersonal effectiveness. Through deep faith—lived consistently in a holy and devout life-style—common hassles and anxieties of life are transformed into true peace—and real love.

Yet, when asked about their basic psychological attitude about life, many persons will say, “I just want to feel good about myself. I want to feel loved. I want a sexual partner. I want to have fun and enjoy life. I’m not a bad person.”

On the surface, according to contemporary social standards, this attitude may seem benign and innocent. But it has deeper social implications that aren’t readily seen.

The fact is, in many of our attempts to enjoy ourselves we end up stepping all over other persons. In seeking wealth we envy and compete with our neighbors, and exploit and deceive the underprivileged. In seeking entertainment we encourage an industry that seduces our entire culture with frivolity, vanity, and pride. In seeking sexual fulfillment we spread emotional wounds and physical disease, along with abortion, child abuse, divorce, pornography, and prostitution. In seeking excitement we create addictions and brew a criminal underground to distribute the materials of addiction. In seeking happiness we’re like the eye of a hurricane, seemingly calm and peaceful, yet blind to the storm spreading chaos all around us.

And that’s what sin is all about. It’s about being completely blind to the bad things we do to others. And yet we’re not bad persons.

We are not bad persons. God created us as good beings to share in his great glory through our free will. Yet because of what theology calls Original Sin we find ourselves separated from a full knowledge of God—and from genuine love. After all, if we really knew love we wouldn’t step all over others and use them as objects for our own satisfaction, would we?

You could program your computer to say, “I love you” every morning when you turn it on, but that synthesized message wouldn’t be love, would it? A computer simply does what it is told to do, and, philosophically, if you cannot say “No” your saying “Yes” is meaningless. Therefore, love must be a free choice—an act of will. And so, when God created us to share in his glory, he gave us free will, so that we would be capable of love. But with free will comes the ability to renounce love. That is what sin amounts to: it’s a renunciation of love; it’s a turning away from moral responsibility to others that ultimately results in a separation from God.

So here we are. We’re not bad persons. And yet we do bad things to others without even seeing it. And, in the very midst of all our searching for satisfaction and contentment in life, we afflict ourselves with anxiety and depression. How, then, shall we ever see the truth? How shall we ever know real love?

Only God himself can show us. Because left to the blindness that characterizes our separation from God,we can see nothing but our own self-indulgent illusions. Left to ourselves, we have nothing but an empty world of social constructions to give us comfort. Left to ourselves, we are lost in slavery to sin.

Now, if God were to appear to us in his full glory, we would surely drop down before him in terror. But we wouldn’t necessarily love him. True love, after all, is an act of self-sacrifice offered in free will, not something engendered by fear.

Psychologically, fear refers to a narcissistic concern about possible damage to our pride and safety. In contrast, fear of God refers to our humble awe before God’s great glory and mercy. Thus, whereas psychological fear pulls us away from God, fear of God leads us directly into the embrace of divine love.

So, in order to teach us true love, God chose to show it to us through the life of a simple, poor man—a life which ended with the most humiliating execution known to humanity.

It was as if God said to all bystanders, those present and those yet to be, “If you can love him, my Son, this humble, broken man hanging in weakness on that cross out of love for you, you can love anything. And if you can love anything, you will finally begin to know me.”

After all, what, in all its blindness, does human culture naturally value? Well, look at politics, sports, and entertainment and you will see an insatiable thirst for wealth, glamor, power, and competition. So is it any wonder that to show us real love, and to bypass all human illusions, God came to us in poverty, simplicity, weakness, and gentleness? And he took all of the insults patiently and quietly, without retaliation, all so that we could see the truth of the sin in our hearts—and repent it, in sorrow for the pain we cause to each other. And that’s why Saint Paul said (1 Corinthians 1:23) that the crucifixion of Christ seemed like folly to the Greeks who valued the “wisdom” of natural philosophy; and to the Jews, who looked for powerful prophetic signs, the crucifixion was a stumbling block. For neither natural wisdom nor power can illuminate their own darkness.

Still, there are those who ask, “But why did he have to die? What does this have to do with love? Why was there bloodshed?”

The answer is twofold. First, the redemption worked in Christ’s death was an example to us. It showed us how we are capable of killing God himself in order to preserve our own self-interests. It showed us, in a way that no event in the world has ever shown before or since, how we, in our hearts—the very hearts God has created—and through our own free will, constantly injure others and defile, mock, and execute divine love in every moment of our lives. It showed us the ugliness and sin we nurture in our own hearts.

So unless we choose to accept the redemption offered in his sacrifice for us—and, in humble, freely willed obedience to the will of God, die to the self-indulgent worldly attachments that nailed him to the cross—we will never know purity of heart and true love.

Three times Peter denied Jesus before the Crucifixion. And three times, after the Resurrection, Christ asked Peter, “Do you love me?” Each time, Peter said “Yes,” and each time Christ told him to tend “my sheep.”

To love is to tend the sheep—not our desires, not our selves, not self-love, and not shadows. But Christ’s sheep. His glory, not ours.

This is a hard thing to accept. Many disciples left Christ because of it. Even today there are those who try to make the Church “relevant” to the modern world. But Christ never said that he came to make life convenient. He came to preach true life. He was not just a “good man”—he was true God and true man whose real presence remains with us always through the Sacraments. Only in the broken bread of the Eucharist can our psychological brokenness be healed. ...

... There will always be those who resist this, those who attack the Church from without and those who sabotage it from within. Yet the choice is simple: will you freely and totally accept the redemption from your own emptiness that is being offered to you, or will you reject it for the sake of your own convenience? If you fail to approach your salvation with fear and trembling (see Philippians 2:12b) because you aren’t willing to sacrifice everything for it—as in the parables of the treasure buried in a field and the pearl of great price (Matthew 13:44–46)—then you probably don’t want it that much to begin with. But if you accept the work of your salvation, you will then, for the rest of your life, bear the sadness of a heart broken by the ignorance, apathy, and sacrilege that surround you. And yet, in the very midst of this pain, you will bear the joy of being able to say to Christ, “Thank you Lord; now I feel what you felt.” And that is true love.

My God, I believe, I adore, I hope, and I love you.
I ask your pardon for those who do not believe, do not adore,
do not hope, and do not love you.
— Fátima, 1917"

This, and more, can be found at: http://www.guidetopsychology.com/catholic.htm

How To Not Be Anxious

Dr. Friedrich (Frederick) Salomon Perls (1893 - 1970), better known as Fritz Perls, was a noted German-born Psychiatrist and psychotherapist of Jewish descent. His approach is related but not identical to Gestalt psychology and the Gestalt Theoretical Psychotherapy of Hans-Juergen Walter. His ideas were also used to develop new age human potential concerns such as neurolinguistic programming NLP.

Dr. "Fritz Perls" is consider by many as the father of Gestalt Therapy.
One of his predominant teachings was that of resolving anxiety by living in the "now", or in other words, fulfilling all psychological needs
(or "unfinished business"), by remaining aware of one's thoughts, emotions and experiences "in-the moment". Although I personally appreciate aspects of Fritz Perl's work in the field of psychology, let us draw a comparison of Dr. Perls to another historical figure, that of
St. Claude de la Columbiere. We will do so by contrasting "prayers" written by each of the two. Prayers that were subsequently recited loyally by ideologically dedicated followers.

The prayer of Dr. Frederick Perls (1969):

"I do my thing and you do your thing.
I am not in this world to live up to your expectations,
And you are not in this world to live up to mine.
You are you, and I am I,
And if by chance we find each other, it's beautiful.
If not, it can't be helped. "

The prayer of St. Claude de la Columbiere:
(middle 1600's)

"My God, I believe most firmly that Thou watchest over all who hope in Thee, and that we can want for nothing when we rely upon Thee in all things; therefore I am resolved for the future to have no anxieties, and to cast all my cares upon Thee.

People may deprive me of worldly goods and of honors; sickness may take from me my strength and the means of serving Thee; I may even lose Thy grace by sin; but my trust shall never leave me. I will preserve it to the last moment of my life, and the powers of hell shall seek in vain to wrestle it from me.

Let others seek happiness in their wealth, in their talents; let them trust to the purity of their lives, the severity of their mortifications, to the number of their good works, the fervor of their prayers; as for me, O my God, in my very confidence lies all my hope.'For Thou, O Lord, singularly has settled me in hope.'
This confidence can never be in vain. 'No one has hoped in the Lord and has been confounded.'

I am assured, therefore, of my eternal happiness,
for I firmly hope for it, and all my hope is in Thee.
'In Thee, O Lord, I have hoped; let me never be confounded.'

I know, alas! I know but too well that I am frail and changeable;
I know the power of temptation against the strongest virtue.
I have seen stars fall from heaven, and pillars of firmament totter; but these things alarm me not.
While I hope in Thee I am sheltered from all misfortune,
and I am sure that my trust shall endure, for I rely upon Thee to sustain this unfailing hope.

Finally, I know that my confidence cannot exceed Thy bounty, and that I shall never receive less than I have hoped for from Thee. Therefore I hope that Thou wilt sustain me against my evil inclinations; that Thou wilt protect me against the most furious assaults of the evil one, and that Thou wilt cause my weakness to triumph over my most powerful enemies. I hope that Thou wilt never cease to love me, and that I shall love Thee unceasingly.
"In Thee, O Lord, have I hoped; let me never be confounded."

Neuro-Theology and Nuns

The UK newspaper Telegraph published an article called “Nuns prove God is not figment of the mind” (08/30/06).

"Scientists have been in the pursuit of the brain processes underlying the Unio Mystica - the Christian notion of mystical union with God - and this endeavour is now part of a newly-emerging field called “neurotheology”.

The article discusses a scientific study of a group of Carmelite nuns. The nuns were asked to relive a religious experience with God while undergoing a brain scan.

"… the study demonstrated that a dozen different regions of the brain are activated during a mystical experience."

In other words, mystical experiences are mediated by several brain regions and systems normally implicated in functions such as self-consciousness, emotion and body representation. Although I am not qualified to comment on the scientific merit of this study, I do find the results of this study quite interesting from a theological point of view. Whereas some scientists have speculated that there is a “God spot” or “God module” — basically a spiritual center of the brain — this study suggests that multiple parts of the brain are at work during a religious experience. This corresponds well with Catholic theology which has long taught that it is the whole person — body, soul, and mind — who encounters the Living God, not just some isolated part of our being. God meets us as we are — in our feelings, in the cells of our muscles, in the remote recesses of our brains, in our relationships — basically wherever we are, God is. So I am not at all surprised by these findings because it “fits” with our faith.

Posted on "A Nun's Life" by Sister Julie Vieira, IHM at http://www.nuns2day.wordpress.com

A Mother Ponders Her "Blog" Addiction

You have something that is causing you to sin. It is easy enough physically to get rid of it, but getting rid of it is *psychologically* difficult. You fear the results. They are all "worldly" results, i.e. loss of status, loss of friendship...

I'm talking about my blogs. I'm writing and thinking about writing, and surfing and thinking about surfing, when I should be living, and thinking about living, teaching, cleaning, loving...

My kids are so emotionally labor intensive, it seems I can't do both. They need all of me.

I can't just walk away and say "I won't blog". I've tried that.

I think I need to delete them.

I fear everyone's reactions. I fear I'll be out of the loop (yet, isn't that WHY I'm doing it? I need to take myself out of the internet loop and into more real life). Yet removing my internet connections removes a large chunk of my solace. Dealing with certain of my children (one of whom is up sobbing in her bed and alternately coming down to argue with me because I made her do math, oh the horrors!) make me feel like I *must* escape to this internet world. I am such an introvert and the computer is where I can get some separation from the intensity of the girls. But maybe they wouldn't be so intense if I was always super-present to them instead of always wanting to hide away.

But it IS an addiction. A sin anytime I willingly choose to partake if I know there is something else I should be doing, right? (there is ALWAYS something else I could/should be doing, like, um PRAYING....sigh)

So I'm throwing this out there for thoughts. I can't hear the Holy Spirit for all my own caterwauling (ooooh woe is meeeee, I shouldn't blog, I want to blog, I want to run and hide....lol). I'm going to rely on some hopefully objective spiritual insight from my readers.

(From Amy, with a beautiful website that focuses on mothers, "Among Women": http.//www.amyable.blogspirit.com )

Husband and Wife, Love and Priority

‘Matrimony is a sacrament to save others - above all, this means, to save the other, the spouse, husband or wife, but also the children and ultimately, the community. Even we priests are able to mature in our encounters with our married parishioners.’

One thing I’ve learned from involvement with Worldwide Marriage Encounter is that the basic vocation of a married couple is to be spouses. Being parents is a consequence of this. Pope Benedict quietly emphasizes this in the quote above. And the Church honors St Joseph on March 19 as the ‘Husband of Mary.’ This is his primary vocation. I normally add and ‘St Joseph, the Husband of Mary’ in Eucharistic Prayers II and III, as in the Roman Canon. In my native Ireland the words ‘spouse,’ ‘husband’ and wife’ have almost become dirty words. ‘Partner’ is the preferred term and, much more worryingly, the preferred choice, if that word can be applied to a refusal to make a public commitment.

Whenever I get the chance, I emphasize to married couples and to those preparing for marriage that they must never let anyone else become more important than their spouse – not their parents and not their children. That needs to be emphasized here in the Philippines where married people have difficulty letting go of their parents, and vice versa, and where for many women – I’ve checked this out with friends – being a mother is more important than being a wife. This isn’t God’s will. I sometimes wonder if we should put more emphasis on the spousal relationship than on family. If the relationship between husband and wife is sound, the rest will follow.

As a priest too I have found healthy relationships with couples and families very helpful to me as I try t live the priesthood. And it works the other way too. This point came up during our recent diocesan synod.

( Written by Father Sean Coyle. Posted by Gerald Augustinus on www.closedcafetiria.blogspot.com )

Why Do People Criticize? (Part Two)

So you see, in one situation we've got a kid who's natural gift or strength in personality happens to be that of "being responsible". Only the mother in this case is feeling guilt and shame for not having been responsible herself having not paid the light bill on time. The mom experiencing nervousness now that they might have their family's lights turned off, suddenly walks past her daughter's bedroom and notices that the daughter, Sarah, had not tucked her blanket under her pillow the precise way she as the mother thought at the time was highly necessary! Mom becomes very angry and accuses her daughter of not being responsible, and always needing her to stand over her to get anything done! Here we have one person who was wrong, becoming angry to another in the precise area within which she was wrong. Yet, while doing so, this daughter particularly "enjoyed" making up her bed promptly each morning, and was considerably responsible in the manner in which she did it! Yet, there was a need in the one who was wrong, to unconsciously criticize another who's very strength is in the area of her wrong! Again let me say, this "always" happens! Only when we are angry in our criticism, we do not see it. At the time of our intensity of harsh judgment, we are "convinced" we are right! Now, to take our analogy a bit further, in this story the mom's daughter becomes angry at her mother then "looks" irresponsible when she runs out the door screaming in anger, "Don't tell me what to do!" ... "I will run my life the way I good and well choose!!!"

This takes us to our next principle in criticism: Because a person's strength or gift will naturally attract criticism or even abuse at that very strength, it is sadly natural as well to react in anger, and thus use that very strength in it's opposite to hurt the one accusing falsely. In that way the incorrect accuser appears right and the deception continues and increases in dysfunctionality. In this case, the one angrily accused being actually responsible in behavior , then using that strength in anger to appear the opposite!

I put it this way, "Who is the person in all the world who is best at baking a 'terrible' cake?" Why, a "chef" of course! A "chef" who's job it is to bake wonderful cakes! Because he who knows all there is about how to bake "wonderful" cakes, knows better than anyone how to bake "terrible", I mean the most "awful" cakes in the whole world! (While it still looks quite good actually)!!!

The same is true of this daughter who makes up her bed each morning without being asked. "Being responsible" for her comes easy. "Being responsible" is a God given core in her personality that all other aspects of her human condition revolves around.

Now notice something. Being "responsible" is just "the other-side-of-the-coin" of being "irresponsible"! Like the chef. When asked (and if he's paid enough money) the chef will bake the worst cake on earth!!! (Someone who knows little about baking cakes will only make a "mediocre" bad cake!!!)

I've seen many, many "responsible" people, when provoked to anger, demonstrate levels of "irresponsibility" the rest of us had never "dreamed" of!!! ... Notice what I mean ...

(1) IRRESPONSIBILITY (The Message: "You are not responsible! "You are lazy!" "I have to do everything for you!!!) The Result: A person who is originally the irresponsible one, in angry criticism will provoke a responsible person to angrily use the strength of responsibility to be irresponsible in levels irresponsible person never knew!!!

(2) NOT GOOD ENOUGH (The Message: "You are stupid!" "You will never amount to anything!" "Nothing you say or do has any good or purpose!) The Result: A person who has done things to not feel worthy will in anger criticize the very person who's specific strength is that of having talent and natural potential. The person then with the talent, with the intelligence, will use that talent and intelligence creatively to frustrate the first person to levels un heard of by appearing untalented, stupid and unworthy!!!

(3) REFUSE TO LISTEN ( The Message: "You never listen to me!" "I could talk until I'm blue in the faces, and for you it would just go through one ear and out the other!") Picture someone standing over another person screaming, "You never listen to me!!!" While this person is screaming, which of the two is not listening??!!! Of course, it is the one who is "screaming"! With all the noise and hurtful words being made, that original person is the one wrong, and is absolutely not listening! ... Yet, the person being harshly accused of "not listening" has the "gift" of listening. And since he or she has the "gift" of listening, he or she also has with that gift, the ability to determine "what is worth listening to!" ... Now if that is done with anger or resentment to, as we have said, "get even", the strength of listening will be used to "not listen", and thus aggravate the screamer of the false accusation!

(4) SELFISH (The Message: "You care only about yourself!" "You are selfish and never think of others!") The one who is screaming the accusation of "not caring" is the person who is selfish, while the one who is being criticized in anger has a special "gift" of caring, and for this reason is being criticized! (Remember the "beam of wood" in the ship.) The fact that the caring person was present to hear the accusation, is an interesting sign that he cares. Finally, however, the caring person can lose patience, then "get even" in hatefulness that brings shock to everyone who witnesses it!

Some of the most naturally caring people can become "hateful" when pushed. I've seen healthy responsibleness "aggravated" out of people. And when you think about it, how many people have you known who grew up being told they would be nothing. Yet, later in life they became "leaders in their fields", and that, with amazing ingenuity!!!

Catholic psychology includes the concept that we humans possess in our selves a thing called sin. This sin, this brokenness, this propensity to do wrong, ... This spiritually rooted hatred we consciously and unconsciously project on others, sometimes includes hiding a wrong in ourselves by attacking what is right in others.

In other words, ... "Because it is consistent that a person who is wrong in a matter hides that wrong by accusing a person who is right and gifted in the precise area where the first person is wrong, it is also consistent that the person who is right and angrily criticized, will be tempted to react to that incorrect accusation or criticism with anger. Then if the person who is right reacts in anger to defend what is true about him or her, the person who was originally wrong looks right, because the person who was originally right looks wrong by defending angrily that which was originally right, which is, ... 'that he or she was originally falsely accused!'"

You see, when someone criticizes or falsely accuses, that person is wrong in that criticizing.